Uncle Sam(US) and Uncle Ken(UK) have just warned their citizens of an increased risk of terrorist attacks in Europe. They raised the terrorism threat level for citizens traveling to Germany and France to high from general. They left the threat level at home unchanged at severe.
Islamoterrorists in hideouts in northwest Pakistan have been plotting coordinated attacks on cities of Germany and France. The plans have survived setbacks from a September surge in drone strikes and an arrest of a terrorist who revealed their plans. Muslims will follow the paradigm of the brazen Mumbai attacks in 2008 that targeted city landmarks such as luxury hotels and a cafe and killed 166 people. Public transportation systems and other tourism-related facilities could be targets. Past attacks had struck rail, airline, and boat services.
Geert Wilders points out Koran is the Islamic Mein Kampf that incites Muslims to resort to violence. Koran calls for hatred, misogyny, polygyny, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. Koran calls for Muslims to kill infidels, to terrorize infidels, and to fulfil their duty to wage war, the violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every motherfucker Muslim ape, Islam is to rule the world by the sword. Koran is clearly antisemitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.
September 11 is the international Koran-burning day. After studying Islam's 1400-year bloody history, knowing Koran's content in its best of details, and the sufferance humanity continues to suffer because of this unholy book, we assert this is one book-burning that humanity would not regret, but would deem it a blessing down the years. The myriad deaths and other sufferings and inequities due to Koran is a reason good enough to justify the burning of this most horrendous book existing on Earth today. But if you insist on burning the Koran because of the radical elements of Islam, then in all fairness, you must also burn the bible because of the radical elements of Christianity. In other words, all religious texts should be burned, because every religion known to humankind has radical elements.
General Petraeus warned that burning the Koran would endanger American troops overseas. Basically he means to say that the radical element of Islam would use the burning of the Koran as an excuse to kill troops and carry out more terrorist attacks. But whether someone burns the Koran, or not, it makes no difference. The thing that makes the radical element of Islam what it is, is that they don't need an excuse to kill troops; they will do this regardless of what anyone does, or does not do. Using Petraeus logic, its like saying that if we don't burn the Koran they will play fair and be nice; this is precisely what terrorist groups do not do. The biggest thing endangering our troops is our very presence overseas, fighting a war on terror that can never be won.
The 9/11 attacks were inspired by the violent and barbaric passages contained in the Koran. While the 3,000 deaths in the 9/11 attacks constitute only a negligibly tiny fraction of the total victims, hundreds of millions, of the violence inspired by this vilest of books ever written in history, it nonetheless can serve as a signature event in the bloody history of Islam, potentially putting an end to Koran's indefatigable violence once and for all. And that can only be achieved by drawing attention of hoi polloi to its message, by prodding and inspiring people to burn all Korans in sight.
Basil Venitis, twitter.com/Venitis, notes the idea of a separation of Mosque and State is unheard of in Islam. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Sharia Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other freakish things, the dehumanization of women, the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers, and the killing of homosexuals, apostates, and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some extremist form of it. If jihadists were actually perverting a great religion, Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to Koran: When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them. Ch. 47:4
Wilders asserts Mohammed was a charlatan, a bipolar maniac, a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and a misogynist. Islamic tradition tells us how Mohammed had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Here is an emoticon of Mohammed with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):-{>
Islam is not a religion, but a satanic terrorist cacoculture. Sure, it has a grudge-collecting god, and an afterlife with 72 virgins for each martyr. But in its essence, Islam is a totalitarian ideology and sadomasochism. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means submission. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is the incivility of terrorist jihad and sharia.
Islamic totalitarianism is potentially far more dangerous than either the Nazi or Communist variety, since the latter, despite their exterminating follies, presupposed their own preservation. For the Nazi, the inferior race does not deserve to exist; for the Stalinist, a capitalist does not merit to continue living; for the Islamist, it is the world itself that does not deserve to exist. When someone tells you he is going to kill you, believe him.
Islam and Nazism share fundamental ideological tenets and premises. It is no coincidence that Islam is compatible with Nazism. Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem agreed wholeheartedly on that point. That agreement was not confined exclusively to their mutual hatred of Jews. The Grand Mufti envied Hitler for the whole of his ideology and for having brought it to fruition.
We detest Islam because it is one of the most degrading evil collectivist creeds in existence. We detest it for all the crimes it has committed throughout history, more than the atrocities committed by any religious creed. We understand the sensitivities and emotions of all their victims. So, if that is bigotry, we will make the most of it. For Islam is distinct from all other creeds for the reason that it is, from top to bottom, virulently antilife.
Venitis asserts that Fourth Reich(EU) should understand and lock horns with an ideology, masquerading as a religion, and rein in Muslims who seek to turn Europe into Eurabia, a theocratic state run by Mullahs and those who wield the sword of Islam. Europe is under threat because European tolerance and European generosity towards those of other countries and cultures are being used by intolerant people, in order to promote intolerance. This is a weakness which can be exploited by them for only so long.
Violence and denial of human rights prevail in Islam. Practices such as stoning of adulterous women, beheadings, execution of apostates, honor killings, hanging of homosexuals, forced child marriages, female circumcision and other odious practices prevail to this day. There is a disgusting hypocritical political correctness relating to Islam that has enveloped Europe. Islam is the Trojan horse in Europe, and if we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia will just be a matter of time.
Venitis asserts that veil and headscarf are not welcome in Fourth Reich(EU), because they are symbols of women's subservience, repression, incivility, and an increasingly divided Fourth Reich. Veil and headscarf make women invisible, transfoms women to zombies, invalidate women's participatory rights, flag women as evil temptresses, oppress women with barbarity, are brands of misogynist Islam, are mobile prisons, and are a security threat.
Muslims are on the march in Europe. And the real problem is the systematic undermining of Graecoroman educational apparatus and the legal system. When religion rules over the state and society, we no longer move in the realm of possibility. We can't ask questions. Only through separation of religion and state is it possible to find common ground. Should a headscarf ban in schools ever make it into the lawbooks, there will be plenty of opportunity to discuss the banning of symbols from other religions. There is already a legal decision that bans the display of Christian crosses in schools, but in practice, its effects have been marginal.
Islam is a creed for zombies, for manques, for men human in form but essentially soulless, regardless of the professions Muslims may follow, for they all surrender their minds and lives to Allah and Mohammed, one a ghost and the other a prophet who was basically a barbarian. Islam was not hijacked, no more than Nazism, Communism, and Shintoism were hijacked to commit mass murders. Islam, like Nazism, Communism, and Shintoism, is an ideology that seeks to eradicate individual rights, property rights, freedom of speech and freedom of conscience. Islam means submission. Islam is not radical. It is a totalitarian system of theocracy through and through. Islam declared war on the West. Americans are just now grasping that for nine years they've been short-changed by Presidents Bush and Obama. Their emotionalism and growing repugnance for Islam are entirely justified. They will not submit to the politically correct mantra that Islam is just another religion.
There is no religious tension that is the burning issue, nor is the tension merely angry and unfocused. Rather, it is tension between a dawning knowledge of the theocratic and totalitarian nature of Islam and the freedoms and liberties that Americans have watched dwindle under the secular authoritarianism of the Obama administration. They see their values and freedoms being attacked, denigrated, ignored, and destroyed. They are saying: Enough is enough. It is a tardy response, to be sure, but it is focused and proper.
Disguised as religion, Islam has penetrated democracies with the aim of replacing civility and liberty with the barbarism of 7th century Islamic theocracy and Sharia law. Islam's multi-pronged attack aims to destroy all that liberty offers. America, with a long tradition of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the hands off practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call. We must keep in mind that to be a loyal and faithful Muslim, a Muslim must adhere to and perform many obligatory acts, as specified in Koran by Allah and the Hadith/Sunna, during his entire life.
The mosque serves as a house where Muslim devotees gather together for salat prayer and worshiping Allah and his messenger, the prophet Muhammad. Aside from worshiping Allah, a mosque is used for a variety of reasons. These meeting places are perfect warehouses of not only indoctrination, but future terrorists, who are made to read and understand the principles of Jihad, martyrdom and Dar ul Harb (land of war, any place not Islamized.) Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of intolerance is coming straight from Saudi Arabia, the #2 terrorist nation on Earth after Turkey.
These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabsim. If you have to ask where the Saudi's are getting their money, you are not paying attention...it's coming from you. Not to mention, Planetarch Husein Obama is doing everything he can to accommodate the Cordoba Initiative project at taxpayers' expense. Those useful idiot non-Muslims who support the building of the mosque near the 9/11 site or anywhere else by invoking the ideal of religious freedom, are empowering a creed that is devoted to stamping out freedom of religion or any other form of freedom.
In this relentless campaign, Muslims have a vast cadre of experts, talking heads, and for-purchase politicians who keep endlessly broadcasting the false mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This latter bunch is criminally complicit in making the populace complacent and furthering the work of terrorist Islam.
When mosques are built, imams, mullahs or mosque elders tend to be sent to the West with one clear mission: Make Islamic religion, laws, and life supreme within the West, using any and all tactics necessary. Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing to force the genteel Westerners to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities. Of course, not all Westerners will move or can afford to do so. And to take control of a town, Muslims will not need to evict everyone. They probably need about 25% in order to make life very unpleasant for those who do not go along with their demands.
They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Sharia law. Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there's nothing the government can or will want to do about it. Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah. Already in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability. Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by many Western countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment