Absolutely, Elaine. Obtain, protect, and enhance OUR BIG BIZ needs. Jefferson set the precedent, when he sent Marines to Tunisia.
Anybody still think the crusades were about RELIGION? Walt
--- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, elaine mckay <glyndon47@...> wrote:
>
> Yes Walt., the greedy would miss out. Of course we all know the trillion dollars worth of resources in the Caspian Basin are why we really want to defeat the taliban.
>
> --- On Wed, 29/9/10, Walt L <muleshet@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Walt L <muleshet@...>
> Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] WHAT WOULD REAL PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST MEAN?
> To: Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> Received: Wednesday, 29 September, 2010, 3:01 AM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
> WARNING: This post contains my OWN ideas, Certainly some is based upon offiicial, and website sources. Careful consideratui given to all source materials.
> IMHO, real PEACE in the Middle East, would turn the current world upside down. The cost of OIL, would drop a lot, as the need to secure it, with military forces, would not exixt.That would aply to many Nations. Defense budgets could br SLASHED in great amounts. The various Military/Industrial complexes would lose their financial strangleholds over National policies. Both the USA's National, and trade deficits would shrink.
> Politically, the HATERS would have no issue to unite them. Bin Laden's friends in Saudi Arabia would not have any need to fund his gang of terrorists. Hanas, and Hwzbollah would soon cease to exist, as Iran, Egypt, and Syria would not need to fund them. Moderate leaders would arise.
> Do you get the big picture? WHY nobody really WANTS serious PEACE??? Walt
>
No comments:
Post a Comment