Purecapitalism members,
It is easier to pasify (interprete) Burqa or hijab, in name of personal choice/ freedom of practicing faith of choice, or some innocent garment. However the matter is not simple. The description that it denies self existence, is understatement.
The burqa, severely damages the confidence of the lady, for prolonged period. It is symbol of medieval period when women chose not to attract the foreign invaders in Afghanistan, Pakistan (then western India). A lady practicing burqa for 10 year, can be totally unfit to work in employment. Thus it promotes & institutes the gender inequity in name of personal freedom. If we appreciate the role of European women in shaping the character of the children, and now in india also, the same opportunity is declined to the Islamic children to have liberal and comfortable upbringing.
Sanjay Jadhav, Delhi
--- On Sun, 3/10/10, geert.wilders_nl <geert.wilders_nl@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: geert.wilders_nl <geert.wilders_nl@yahoo.com>
Subject: [purecapitalism] ANGLONINJAS
To: purecapitalism@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, 3 October, 2010, 12:58 PM
Violence and denial of human rights prevail in Islam. Practices such as stoning of adulterous women, beheadings, execution of apostates, honor killings, hanging of homosexuals, forced child marriages, female circumcision and other odious practices prevail to this day. There is a disgusting hypocritical political correctness relating to Islam that has enveloped Europe. Islam is the Trojan horse in Europe, and if we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia will just be a matter of time.
Basil Venitis was shocked when he saw a Ninja in London. Venitis notes that Ninjas, diapered Rubenesques, the Islamic zombies, show the misogyny of Islam. Europeans cannot tolerate the burqa, an outer garment covering a woman from head to toe with just a mesh screen to look through , and the niqab, similar to a burqa but with a slit for the eyes instead of mesh, as oppressive to women. The burqa and niqab confiscate a woman's existence, and they are a sign of enslavement and debasement. Those who wear them are victims, zombified by Islamofascists. EU favors banning these coffins for women's basic liberties. The burqa and niqab are proof of the presence of Muslim fundamentalists on Fourth Reich soil and of the politicization of Islam.
Islamic schools in UK have introduced uniform policies which force girls to wear the burqa or niqab. This is a dangerous precedent. Children attending such schools are being brainwashed and trained to become terrorists. At least three British schools have introduced a compulsory burqa or niqab policy when girls are walking to or from school:
* Madani Girls' School in east London;
* Jamea Al Kauthar in Lancaster;
* Jameah Girls' Academy in Leicester.
All three are independent, fee-paying, single-sex schools for girls aged 11 to 18. Venitists warned that the spectacle of burqa-clad pupils entering and leaving the schools at the start and end of the day could damage relations between Muslim and non-Muslim communities.
It is absurd that schools are enforcing this outdated ritual - one that which sends out a damaging message that Muslims do not want to fully partake in British society. Although it is not the government's job to dictate how its citizens dress, it should nonetheless ensure that such schools are not bankrolled or subsidised by the British taxpayer. The enforcing of the niqab on young girls is not a mainstream Islamic practice - either in Britain or in most Muslim-majority countries. It is a desert practice which belongs to another century and another world.
Philip Hollobone, the Tory MP who has attempted to bring in a Private Members' Bill to ban wearing of the burqa in public, also condemned the schools' uniform policies. Hollobone points out it is very sad in 21st century Britain that three schools are effectively forcing girls as young as 11 to hide their faces. How on earth are these young ladies going to grow up as part of a fully integrated society if they are made to regard themselves as objects at such a young age?
Conservative councillors have accused Labour-controlled Tower Hamlets council of subsidising Madani Girls' School by selling the school its current premises for £320,000 below market value. Councillors were advised to allow the sale at a loss because the price had been agreed in 2004 when it represented a fair market value. The deal had been delayed by four years because the school needed to raise funds, but council chiefs wanted to honour the originally-agreed figure.
However, council minutes from December 2008 show that Tim Archer, a Tory councillor, warned that a council asset was being sold below market value and public money was being used to subsidise the purchase. He also suggested the school was in breach of the council's inclusiveness policy. Madani, which has 260 pupils, charges fees of £1,900 a year. Its website states: All payments should be made in cash. We do not accept cheques.
School uniform rules state: The present uniform conforms to the Islamic Code of dressing. Outside the school, this comprises of the black Burqa and Niqab. The admission application form warns girls will be appropriately punished for failing to wear the correct uniform, and if parents are approached by the Education Department regarding their child's education, they should not disclose any information without discussing it with the committee! Why, something to hide?
Ninja, a woman wearing a burqa or a niqab, is in a state of unbearable isolation, exclusion, and humiliation. Her very existence is denied. The sight of these zombies is intolerable when it comes to us from terrorist Islam. It is totally unacceptable on the soil of Fourth Reich. Zombie dressing is a question of freedom and of women's dignity. The number of ninjas is growing exponentially. Even if ninjas are not jihadists, they hate the West, they spit on the kuffars, the infidels, but they take advantage of all the Fourth Reich social services instead of settling in a Muslim land as dictated by their doctrine. Their duplicity bewilders Europeans.
Kemal and Stalin are the only modern rulers who have subjugated militant political Islam, unveiled women, and controlled the mullahs. But their ferocity would be impossible now. If there is a middle way between such repression and the return of Turkey to its Muslim past, nobody has yet found it. If they do, it may be incompatible with the 21st-century belief in the goodness of democracy and the sanctity of human rights.
Female suicide bombers usually are black widows, Islamist females whose husbands or sons have been killed by infidel forces. Civil Society now fears a tide of black widows. The female militants have been involved in many attacks in recent years, including the 2002 siege of a Moscow theater, a February 2004 bombing in the Moscow metro which killed 39 people, and a March 2010 bombing in Moscow metro that killed 40 people. Many of the women are recruited against their will. Only one in 10 black widows acts out of conviction. The others are forced into the role. Islamist women have no right to their own opinion and can not refuse to obey orders. The patriarchal society treats them merely as a renewable resource.
Mutaween are religious-policing organizations with government recognition and support who enforce the Sharia Law. Mutaween consists of myriad officers in addition to myriad volunteers. They have the power to arrest unrelated males and females caught socializing, anyone engaged in homosexual behavior or prostitution, to enforce Islamic dress-codes, and store closures during the prayer time. They enforce Muslim dietary laws, prohibit the consumption or sale of alcoholic beverages and pork, and seize banned consumer products and media regarded as un-Islamic, such as CDs/DVDs of various Western musical groups, television shows and film. Additionally, they actively prevent the practice or proselytizing of other religions.
Mutaween use flogging to punish violators, ban Valentines Day gifts, arrest priests for saying Mass, and are staffed by ex-convicts whose only job qualification was that they had memorized Koran in order to reduce their sentences. They prevent women from escaping burning buildings, if the women do not wear burqas, and not accompanied by a male guardian; many women died and were injured as a result. Some women who converted to Christianity were burned to death after having their tongues cut out.
Venitis asserts that veil and headscarf are not welcome in Fourth Reich(EU), because they are symbols of women's subservience, repression, incivility, and an increasingly divided Fourth Reich. Veil and headscarf make women invisible, transfoms women to zombies, invalidate women's participatory rights, flag women as evil temptresses, oppress women with barbarity, are brands of misogynist Islam, are mobile prisons, and are a security threat.
The headscarf is more than just a piece of fabric, more than just another article of clothing, and definitely not some hip lifestyle accessory that heavily made-up girls should use to add a little color to their wardrobe. No, the headscarf is a flag and symbol of Islam. Teachers are no longer allowed to wear the head scarf in European public schools, and now girls should be forbidden to wear it as well. Only this forceful act would finally give a Muslim young woman the chance to move with freedom and equality, at least within the confines of the schoolyard.
The wearing of the headscarf, which turns the girls into strangers who are cut off socially and limited physically, comes along with a whole array of special treatments that their parents demand from the school. It is always a question of dividing the sexes, giving girls special dispensation from swimming class or gym class, from school trips, and from sex education classes.
Muslims are on the march in Europe. And the real problem is the systematic undermining of Graecoroman educational apparatus and the legal system. When religion rules over the state and society, we no longer move in the realm of possibility. We can't ask questions. Only through separation of religion and state is it possible to find common ground. Should a headscarf ban in schools ever make it into the lawbooks, there will be plenty of opportunity to discuss the banning of symbols from other religions. There is already a legal decision that bans the display of Christian crosses in schools, but in practice, its effects have been marginal.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment