Europe's socialism has some good points except that it permitted foreign workers and too much foreign immigration
--- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, patrick mc govern <mcgvrn_ptrck@...> wrote:
>
> Capitalism is not self sustaining. If there is no middle class to purchase goods and services than Capitalism will eventually fail, thus proving that no one economic model is the answer. Now where it co exists with a social safety net, its thriving. Sweden and Finland are perfect examples of this sucessful model
>
>
> Â You can lead people to knowledge but you can't make them think
>
> --- On Tue, 11/30/10, Dave Ketchum <davek@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Dave Ketchum <davek@...>
> Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System
> To: PEACENET@..., Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 9:47 PM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
> Reading too much about the evils of capitalism, I went looking for a defense, and found one I liked:  "http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/v1n3/thompson.html" - On Principle, v1n3, October 1993, by: C. Bradley Thompson.  Based on the words I like there:
>
>
>
> "The intellectuals’ mantra runs something like this: In theory socialism is the morally superior social system despite its dismal record of failure in the real world. Capitalism, by contrast, is a morally bankrupt system despite the extraordinary prosperity it has created. In other words, capitalism at best, can only be defended on pragmatic grounds. We tolerate it because it works."
>
>
> "Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent."
> "Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system."
> I think of restaurants as, usually, capitalistic efforts - rewarding those who produce well. Â On the other hand, some of what involves lots of money is not truly capitalism because of the ways decisions are made and rewarded.
> Seems like we live in a mixed economy of capitalism and socialism. Â Makes sense, but we could sometimes do better as to how we mix them together. Â Part of what I read here seems biased too much against socialism.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment