[Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Re: why companies go out of business

| | |

Friday, December 31, 2010

 

Of course, Singapore is no paradise, but have you ever compaired the life in Singapore with the life in North Korea?

--- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "Sheep&Goatlady" <springcreek@...> wrote:
>
> and the laws there are not the kind you would want here,, like caning some
> one if they stratch a car,, restricted in what they can do and how they
> live, plus for all the weatlh they have , folks live like little ants, one
> on top of another,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "zeus32117" <zeus32117@...>
> To: <Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:10 AM
> Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Re: why companies go out of business
>
>
> I think that it isn't possible for a government to enable companies to
> maximize their profits. A government can interfere with wealth creation
> more, or interfere with it less. According to what I have read, the
> government of Singapore interferes with wealth creation less than that of
> any other country. The government of Hong Kong was interfering with wealth
> creation even less than that of Singapore. That may have changed after Hong
> Kong became a part of China.
>
> --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "Walt L" <muleshet@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Are you asking if I would have let then go
> > "under?" IMO, that would have been a very bad mistake at a bad time. I
> > have been a strong critic of their business practices, and their UNIONS
> > as well, for many years. I see them paying back the help they got, and
> > some sense coming back to wages, and profits. Walt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "zeus32117"
> > <zeus32117@> wrote:
> > >
> > > You have said that the government has enabled big business to maximize
> > profit. Are you talking about Chrysler and General Motors?
> > >
> > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "Walt L"
> > muleshet@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In 1980, I might have blamed Unions. At that
> > > > time they controlled a bout 40% of the work force. Today it is
> > around
> > > > 15%. Since those days, Government has enabled big biz to maximize
> > > > profits. NAFTA, and other "free trade" agreements have been ABUSED
> > in
> > > > every way possible. Walt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "zeus32117"
> > > > <zeus32117@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The greater the tax burden and the regulatory burden on companies
> > in
> > > > U.S. is the more of an incentive U.S. companies have to do business
> > in
> > > > another country instead of doing business here.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com,
> > "Sheep&Goatlady"
> > > > springcreek@ wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, Susan, recently there was a doctumentary Mardi Gai made in
> > > > china,, it is about those beads they give away during Mardi Gra,,
> > rather
> > > > interesting to watch,, you ought to get informed,, And doctumentary
> > > > about clothes being made off shore, one jacket cost to make and
> > > > materials ,72 cents,, sold here in the US for over 30 dollars, that
> > is a
> > > > example,, what kind of profit does one jacket made? well over 1000
> > > > percentage,
> > > > > > Are you serious about investing? the stock market is doing well,
> > how
> > > > come there is so many folks out of work? investments are going over
> > > > seas, not here in the US,, the US has become a nation of consumers
> > not a
> > > > nation of producers,, the US agri world is one of the few things
> > left
> > > > that is made in america,,,
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: Susan
> > > > > > To: Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 4:09 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] why companies go out
> > of
> > > > business
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Business go out of business for a huge variety of reasons.
> > > > > > Labor costs go up too much due to unions, the product is out
> > dated
> > > > and more. It is the employees fault if they demand so much the
> > company
> > > > can't make money. When that happens people won't invest their money
> > in
> > > > the company.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't want to sound insulting but do you have any idea how
> > > > business works let alone capitalism? I don't have a business degree
> > but
> > > > know enough to know how it works. I really think you need to educate
> > > > yourself about this subject.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM, iloveubuntulinux valchaulinux@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > most companies go out of business due to the ineptitude of those
> > > > running them or under capitalization or corruption. It isn't the
> > fault
> > > > of employees.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, "zeus32117"
> > > > <zeus32117@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why do you think most companies go out of business?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "Sheep&Goatlady" springcreek@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Unions allow sub standard employees to keep their jobs? how
> > many
> > > > union workers do you know? Bad teachers? I guess you know nothing
> > about
> > > > teaching,, teachers have a contract, and they are renew very often
> > on a
> > > > yearly basis,
> > > > > > > > and you are very wrong about UPS,, you know nothing about
> > them,,
> > > > One a driver gets one accident while working for ups , that can be
> > fired
> > > > on the spot,, You still have no clue about them at all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: Susan
> > > > > > > > To: Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 10:50 AM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Re: Health
> > reform
> > > > for all Americans - St Pete Times
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I find your comments interesting at best. I think you need
> > to
> > > > look at all types of companies and who owns them. Not all companies
> > are
> > > > run by those who work at them by far. It is ridiculous to assume so
> > and
> > > > very closed minded.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Unions allow sub-standard employees to keep their jobs when
> > > > otherwise they would be replaced. I don't know if you read the news
> > but
> > > > there are huge numbers of bad teachers out there who cannot be fired
> > > > because of tenure and the unions. UPS for example has to jump
> > through
> > > > hoops to fire employees who preform badly as in sleeping in the
> > trucks,
> > > > constantly late to work or not showing up at all. Unions are too big
> > and
> > > > need to go.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, iloveubuntulinux
> > valchaulinux@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, Susan
> > > > <sailorgirl43@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Some corporations are like that but in the past 10 years
> > > > corporations have
> > > > > > > > > been eliminating their bloat to make money, pay people and
> > > > please their
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > share holders. the people they pay are those running the
> > > > company and those folks are also often very big shareholders so it
> > is a
> > > > form of self dealing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Private corporations are much more streamed lines than the
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > government because they do answer to others. that is a
> > myth.
> > > > the biggest shareholders now are those running the corp. They got
> > stock
> > > > options and now run the place
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have never seen such waste as
> > > > > > > > > in government and especially when the workers have a union
> > to
> > > > defend their
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > bad actions. unions don't defend 'bad actions' of workers.
> > > > They defend against bad actions of management and the management is
> > all
> > > > self dealing since they both run the corporation and own large
> > chunks of
> > > > its stock
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:42 AM, iloveubuntulinux
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > valchaulinux@:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the govt is just like the big corporations - top heavy
> > with
> > > > those who are
> > > > > > > > > > fat and lazy and rake in the dough. And the actual work
> > is
> > > > done by human
> > > > > > > > > > beings with families who are (in private industry)
> > easily
> > > > discarded but in
> > > > > > > > > > the govt have at least some rights
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com,
> > Susan
> > > > sailorgirl43@
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There are surveys done and money is counted when it
> > comes
> > > > in to
> > > > > > > > > > charities,
> > > > > > > > > > > very simple to find out.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There is huge waste in the all government. It is top
> > heavy
> > > > and so money
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > wasted by the thousands. Evangelical Christians don't
> > > > restrict donations.
> > > > > > > > > > > Where do you get this stuff.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Sheep&Goatlady
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > springcreek@:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Are they? How do you know what other folks donate?
> > Waste
> > > > money in
> > > > > > > > > > giving a
> > > > > > > > > > > > decent health care to folks? Heatlh care to child?
> > To
> > > > have safe food on
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > table? To ensure women get decent wages? that is a
> > waste
> > > > of money? Do
> > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > know what the nieghbor next door gives? there was a
> > > > gentleman on tv,,
> > > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > ID was hidden, that gave away 100 dollar bucks to
> > > > needy,, Do you know
> > > > > > > > > > who he
> > > > > > > > > > > > was? No,, and most evangelical christians restrict
> > who
> > > > they give their
> > > > > > > > > > money
> > > > > > > > > > > > too,, some folks give without making a big to do
> > about
> > > > it,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Susan sailorgirl43@
> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:16 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Health
> > > > reform for all
> > > > > > > > > > > > Americans - St Pete Times
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The group of people who give the most money away
> > > > > > > > > > > > are Evangelical Christians. There are many million
> > and
> > > > billionaires who
> > > > > > > > > > give
> > > > > > > > > > > > tons of money to needy people. It is not that people
> > > > don't want to give
> > > > > > > > > > > > because they do. They resent paying high taxes to
> > people
> > > > who waste the
> > > > > > > > > > money
> > > > > > > > > > > > in big government machine.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:51 PM, elaine mckay
> > > > glyndon47@:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> I don't understand why many conservatives focus on
> > > > getting more money
> > > > > > > > > > > >> and never on giving something to humanity, even in
> > > > their own country.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Not everyone can afford life giving treatment and
> > so
> > > > die? thats so
> > > > > > > > > > wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> I don't have class envy because in Australia we
> > don't
> > > > have that class
> > > > > > > > > > > >> system.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Everyone is entitled to free health care and
> > education.
> > > > If you want
> > > > > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > > > > > >> you pay for it, and thats fine.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> it's called looking after you fellow man, or having
> > a
> > > > social
> > > > > > > > > > concience.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> --- On *Mon, 20/12/10, patrick mc govern
> > mcgvrn_ptrck@*
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> From: patrick mc govern mcgvrn_ptrck@
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Health
> > reform
> > > > for all
> > > > > > > > > > Americans -
> > > > > > > > > > > >> St Pete Times
> > > > > > > > > > > >> To: "free" freethinkersclub@yahoogroups.com, "dea"
> > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >> DuanesEverythingandAnything@yahoogroups.com, "pcc"
> > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >> politics_currentevents_group@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Received: Monday, 20 December, 2010, 10:42 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Health reform for all Americans
> > > > > > > > > > > >> By Eric H. Holder Jr. and Kathleen Sebelius,
> > Washington
> > > > Post
> > > > > > > > > > > >> In Print: Wednesday, December 15, 2010
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> In March, New Hampshire preschool teacher Gail
> > O'Brien,
> > > > who was unable
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >> obtain health insurance through her employer, was
> > > > diagnosed with an
> > > > > > > > > > > >> aggressive form of lymphoma. Her subsequent
> > > > applications for health
> > > > > > > > > > > >> insurance were rejected because of her condition.
> > With
> > > > each round of
> > > > > > > > > > > >> chemotherapy costing $16,000, she delayed treatment
> > > > because she knew
> > > > > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > > > > > >> savings wouldn't last. . Then President Barack
> > > > Obama signed the
> > > > > > > > > > Affordable
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Care Act. Thanks to this law, O'Brien is getting
> > > > treatment through a
> > > > > > > > > > > >> temporary program that provides affordable coverage
> > to
> > > > people who have
> > > > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > >> shut out of the insurance market because of a
> > > > pre-existing condition.
> > > > > > > > > > Even
> > > > > > > > > > > >> better, she knows that in 2014 insurers will be
> > banned
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > discriminating
> > > > > > > > > > > >> against any American with pre-existing conditions.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> That's what makes the recent lawsuits challenging
> > the
> > > > Affordable Care
> > > > > > > > > > Act
> > > > > > > > > > > >> so troubling. Roughly 20 cases question the new
> > law's
> > > > individual
> > > > > > > > > > > >> responsibility provision, which says that Americans
> > who
> > > > can afford to
> > > > > > > > > > must
> > > > > > > > > > > >> maintain basic health coverage.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Federal courts in Michigan and Virginia have upheld
> > the
> > > > law as
> > > > > > > > > > > >> constitutional, but Monday, a federal court in
> > Virginia
> > > > reached the
> > > > > > > > > > opposite
> > > > > > > > > > > >> result. These and other cases will continue through
> > our
> > > > courts as
> > > > > > > > > > opponents
> > > > > > > > > > > >> try to block the law. But these attacks are wrong
> > on
> > > > the law, and if
> > > > > > > > > > allowed
> > > > > > > > > > > >> to succeed, they would have devastating
> > consequences
> > > > for everyone with
> > > > > > > > > > > >> health insurance.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> The majority of Americans who have health insurance
> > pay
> > > > a higher price
> > > > > > > > > > > >> because of our broken system. Every insured family
> > pays
> > > > an average of
> > > > > > > > > > $1,000
> > > > > > > > > > > >> more a year in premiums to cover the care of those
> > who
> > > > have no
> > > > > > > > > > insurance.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Everyone wants health care to be affordable and
> > > > available when they
> > > > > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > > > > >> it. But we have to stop imposing extra costs on
> > people
> > > > who carry
> > > > > > > > > > insurance,
> > > > > > > > > > > >> and that means everyone who can afford coverage
> > needs
> > > > to carry minimum
> > > > > > > > > > > >> health coverage starting in 2014.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> If we want to prevent insurers from denying
> > coverage to
> > > > people with
> > > > > > > > > > > >> pre-existing conditions, it's essential that
> > everyone
> > > > have coverage.
> > > > > > > > > > Imagine
> > > > > > > > > > > >> what would happen if everyone waited to buy car
> > > > insurance until after
> > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > >> got in an accident. Premiums would skyrocket,
> > coverage
> > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > > >> unaffordable, and responsible drivers would be
> > priced
> > > > out of the
> > > > > > > > > > market.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> The same is true for health insurance. Without an
> > > > individual
> > > > > > > > > > > >> responsibility provision, controlling costs and
> > ending
> > > > discrimination
> > > > > > > > > > > >> against people with pre-existing conditions doesn't
> > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> The legal arguments made against the law gloss over
> > > > this problem even
> > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > >> opponents have sought to invent new constitutional
> > > > theories and dig up
> > > > > > > > > > old
> > > > > > > > > > > >> ones that were rejected 80 years ago.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Opponents claim the individual responsibility
> > provision
> > > > is unlawful
> > > > > > > > > > > >> because it "regulates inactivity." But none of us
> > is a
> > > > bystander when
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > >> comes to health care. All of us need health care
> > > > eventually. Do we pay
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > >> advance, by getting insurance, or do we try to pay
> > > > later, when we need
> > > > > > > > > > > >> medical care?
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> The individual responsibility provision says that
> > as
> > > > participants in
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >> health care market, Americans should pay for
> > insurance
> > > > if they can
> > > > > > > > > > afford
> > > > > > > > > > > >> it. That's important because when people who don't
> > have
> > > > insurance show
> > > > > > > > > > up at
> > > > > > > > > > > >> emergency rooms, we don't deny them care. The costs
> > of
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > uncompensated
> > > > > > > > > > > >> care - $43 billion in 2008 - are then
> > passed on
> > > > to doctors, hospitals,
> > > > > > > > > > small
> > > > > > > > > > > >> businesses and Americans who have insurance.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> As two federal courts have already held, this
> > unfair
> > > > cost-shifting
> > > > > > > > > > harms
> > > > > > > > > > > >> the marketplace. For decades, Supreme Court
> > decisions
> > > > have made clear
> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > >> the Constitution allows Congress to adopt rules to
> > deal
> > > > with such
> > > > > > > > > > harmful
> > > > > > > > > > > >> economic effects, which is what the law does -
> > it
> > > > regulates how we pay
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > >> health care by ensuring that those who have
> > insurance
> > > > don't continue
> > > > > > > > > > to pay
> > > > > > > > > > > >> for those who don't. Because of the long-held legal
> > > > precedent of
> > > > > > > > > > upholding
> > > > > > > > > > > >> such provisions, even President Ronald Reagan's
> > > > solicitor general,
> > > > > > > > > > Charles
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Fried, called legal objections to the law
> > > > "far-fetched."
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> As these lawsuits continue, Americans should be
> > clear
> > > > about what the
> > > > > > > > > > > >> opponents of reform are asking the courts to do.
> > > > Striking down the
> > > > > > > > > > > >> individual responsibility provision means slamming
> > the
> > > > door on
> > > > > > > > > > millions of
> > > > > > > > > > > >> those like Gail O'Brien, who have been locked out
> > of
> > > > our health
> > > > > > > > > > insurance
> > > > > > > > > > > >> markets, and shifting more costs onto families who
> > have
> > > > acted
> > > > > > > > > > responsibly.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> It's not surprising that opponents, having lost in
> > > > Congress, have
> > > > > > > > > > taken to
> > > > > > > > > > > >> the courts. We saw similar challenges to laws that
> > > > created Social
> > > > > > > > > > Security
> > > > > > > > > > > >> and established new civil rights protections. Those
> > > > challenges
> > > > > > > > > > ultimately
> > > > > > > > > > > >> failed, and so will this one.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Rather than fighting to undo the progress we've
> > made,
> > > > and returning to
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >> days when one out of seven Americans was denied
> > > > insurance due to their
> > > > > > > > > > > >> medical histories, supporters of repeal should work
> > > > with us to
> > > > > > > > > > implement
> > > > > > > > > > > >> this law effectively. The initial decisions about
> > the
> > > > Affordable Care
> > > > > > > > > > Act
> > > > > > > > > > > >> will be reviewed on appeal. We are confident that
> > the
> > > > law will
> > > > > > > > > > ultimately be
> > > > > > > > > > > >> upheld.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> © 2010 Washington Post
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Mister Colibri Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario