The leaders of the Fourth Reich(EU) Member Countries decided on a Treaty change to allow the establishment of a stupid permanent mechanism to safeguard the pseudostability of the eurozone. This illegal revision of article 136 of the Lisbon Treaty requires consultation of the European Parliament, Commission, and the European Central Bank. Eventualy all stupid changes to the hateful Lisbon Treaty will pile up, transforming Fourth Reich from the present confederation to a federation.
Europeans consider the European Union null and void confederation, because they did not vote for any constitutional treaty! Eurokleptocrats pulled off the biggest powergrab in history by imposing a camouflaged constitution, bypassing all nonos. The Nazi dream for Europe was finally fullfilled - ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer - one people, one empire, one leader. The Lisbon Treaty is Eurokleptocracy's Pyrrhic victory. It created a confederation, Fourth Reich, without a popular foundation. EU lacks legitimacy among Europeans. Eurokleptocrats created a situation where the citizens of slave States live their lives with a resigned feeling that the EU project is not their own.
VAT and kleptocracy are two good reasons to secede from Fourth Reich(EU) now. Vatstruck Fourthreichians are looking for a Moses to liberate them from the yoke of Brussels. They have to do it now, before a new imposed treaty between Eurokleptocrats tie their hands forever. Californians and Texans want to secede from USA, but Uncle Sam does not allow it. The same thing might happen with Britons and Greeks. Infinite infinitesimal amendments to treaties might accumulate over time, leading to huge changes of original intent, enslaving all Fourthreichians to Brussels forever!
The fact that the EU Treaty change proposed to allow Member States to set up a permanent mechanism to safeguard eurozone stability was an intergovernmental choice, rather than an EU one, prompted concerns among Constitutional Affairs Committee MEPs on Tuesday. The tight timetable for the proposed change also worried several MEPs.
Both co-rapporteurs on the issue questioned whether the method chosen by the Member States to establish such a mechanism was the right one. "Is this necessary constitutionally?" asked Roberto Gualtieri (S&D, IT), pointing out that "we are building a mechanism with a totally intergovernmental foundation, and not an EU mechanism".
Elmar Brok (EPP, DE), shared this concern about the intergovernmental nature of the change, but observed "I don't think it is possible for Parliament to change the text; nor do I think we can play the game of preventing the decision of the European Council in March, because of the emergency in the Member States and the effect on the markets".
Andrew Duff (ALDE, UK), felt that if the stability mechanism "cannot be created as part of the Union system", then it would be preferable "that it is at least created on the presumption that in the end it is going to be integrated".
Soren Bo Sondergaard (GUE/NGL, DK), underlined that his group had been the only one demanding a Convention to discuss the Treaty change and argued that "what we decide will predetermine the future". Gerald Haefner (Greens/EFA, DE), also voiced concern about the chosen "fast-track" method and wondered whether the MEPs would be "facing this again and again".
Several MEPs backed the proposed method and timetable, though often with reservations: "There is no alternative – the question is do we want a mechanism or not. I'll pay that price", said Vital Moreira (S&D, PT), who described accepting the intergovernmental aspect as "swallowing a bitter pill".
David Martin (S&D, UK), and Inigo Mendez De Vigo (EPP, ES), both emphasized the urgency of the issue, with the latter remarking that "when the European Council has speeded up the timetables, Parliament would give the wrong signal if we hindered this; we need to contribute to stability".
The freakish government of Greece, October-18 mafia, robs computers and terrorizes the blogosphere! Why on Earth Durao Barroso, Neelie Kroes, Viviane Reding, and Cecilia Malmstroem of the European Commission cannot rein in Graecokleptocrats? If Fourth Reich(EU) cannot protect Greeks from the Greek government, who will? Greek dissident bloggers want back their stolen computers, their stolen files, their stolen persona data, and their stolen lives. Restitution is a basic right in a civil society. Brutal Graecocybercops should be abolished now.
Premier George Papandreou of Greece crossed the Rubicon on October 18, 2010, when a deranged Greek Minister of Foreign Affairs destroyed a distinguished professor and dissident blogger, in order to appease Premier Erdogan of Turkey! That's why the Global Tax Revolt declared October 18 as the International Day Against Cybercop Brutality. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/globaltaxrevolt
The Constitutional Affairs Committee will probably discuss the Treaty change in extraordinary meetings on 7 and 14 February. There is as yet no date for the committee or plenary votes, but the process is expected to be finalised before the European Council meeting on 24–25 March, where the Member Countries hope to adopt the Treaty change formally. Thereafter, it still needs to be ratified by all 27 Member States. The target timetable for the entry into force of the permanent stability mechanism is 1 January 2013.
Smart words are more effective than smart bombs! Mighty words of a charismatic keynote speaker can transform your people to a new dimension of organizational climate, efficiency, self-actualization, enthusiasm, belonging, and motivation. To get such a speaker to your conference, write to keynote.speakers@yahoo.com
TERMS
April 15: International Day Against Taxes
October 18: International Day Against Cybercop Brutality
October-18 Mafia: Government of Greece
Parliament of Whores: Congress of USA
Grand Brothel on Syntagma Square: Parliament of Greece
Eldorado of Prostitutes: European Parliament
Eldorado of Corruption: European Commission
Fourth Reich: European Union
Fourthreichians: Citizens of the European Union
No comments:
Post a Comment