This written by a Retired Marine
Glenn,
The work you do is so valuable to healing the sickness of ignorance, stupidity, and apathy, that is pandemic in America, that I stopped bringing up the areas in which I thought you were neglecting. But I guess my "reminders" are nothing compared to what you get from liberals all the time. And I support you no matter what you do with my offerings of help. So here are a few more dots to work with.
This is about the third time that you have commented about Senator Joe McCarthy, and only the first time that I thought maybe you weren't mocking him. You never did get around to clarifying that yesterday. McCarthy was doing exactly what you are doing in drawing attention to the presence, and dangers of communists in the government. A communist is really a radical socialist. And socialists, communists, and radicals all present a clear and present danger to America's uniqueness and greatness. While you may feel like you are surrounded by communists working and living in New York and New England, McCarthy was working among them. Since "eliminating" him would be too obvious and risky on the part of the PTB (Powers That Be) it stands to reason that they would instead; isolate, polarize, and ridicule him. (a radical rule!) And they did it effectively enough that his reputation was tarnished for the last 60 years! Had you not cast a potential shadow on that yesterday, perhaps no one would ever consider that as a purposeful smear.
Cleon Skousen worked in the FBI at that time and eventually wrote a book he titled The Naked Communist in which he elaborated on what had been found out about regarding all the communists that were in the government.
_________
An interesting sidebar here is that Ronald Reagan met his second wife, Nancy Davis, as the President of the SAG, when, as an actress, was seeking help regarding being "blacklisted as a communist" in 1949. She was merely the bearer of a name that was also owned by another Nancy Davis, who was the communist sympathizer. Reagan started as a liberal democrat admiring FDR and the New Deal, then later became a conservative Republican because of it, and actively supported Goldwater in 1964.
_________
President Reagan did great things in office and won the hearts and minds of American conservatives, even though he did go against his better judgement and choose the man he said he would never trust, as his VP running mate, and he granted amnesty to illegal immigrants. Perhaps you could research a man that might have done as well for conservative principles in government as Reagan did, and that is Barry Goldwater. But he wasn't given a chance. He, too, was "Alinskyized", which ought to be every conservative's "red badge of courage". Anyone that is doing a significant good for righteousness is going to be targeted by the left, as they hate the light of day (truth). (They're like vampires!)
LBJ's Great Society assured a victory over Goldwater (branded AuH2O) by additional subversion from within the Republican Party by Nelson Rockefeller (a progressive by thought and deed, but not by admission). Who can forget the LBJ ads showing Goldwater with a mushroom cloud behind him on the horizon! But I guess you would have had to have seen them first. I graduated from high school that year. It was my Dad who told me what was really going on.
__________
"Resetting" the relationship between America and the former Soviet Union, Russia, is just a ploy to get people used to seeing "former communists" as good guys now. The nuclear disarmament treaty is doing nothing more than, allowing the dismantling of old Soviet nuclear weapons so it will be easier to get the right materials to the radical Muslims without just handing over the missiles.
__________
It will be interesting to see if General Petraeus tries to get the Rules of Engagement lifted to make the war effort more effective. Some are saying he will do it himself, but they forget that the rules come from the civilians in the Pentagon, not from the Commanders in the field.
__________
Who is going to be the one that gets Obama to answer the question on why he is halting the building of the sand berms in the Gulf? That will be an interesting answer.
__________
Your frequent reference to Quigley's book Tragedy and Hope would normally make one think you have read it. Perhaps you got a cross-reference to the Mutually Assured Economic Destruction on Google and looked that up in it. However you failed to report that this policy was NOT just an observation of happenstance by him, but that the PTB had ensured its reality in order to guarantee the economic MAD to act as a deterrent against attacking one of their "protectorates". Quigley was knowledgeable of their doings, having spent a couple of years among them for whatever reasons! That's how he knew it. You seemed to have overlooked the fact that Quigley "spilled the beans" by writing that book, and shed a lot of light on the intent and motivations of those that operate in secrecy to get power and gain around the world. His book, sparked several authors that followed up the investigations that were needed to look into the secret society. And just by "coincidence", Cleon Skousen was one of them, and the book he wrote was The Naked Capitalist, the book I've been mentioning to you for over a year. He explains how communist defectors had revealed information about "contacts" the KGB agents had in NYC to seek help from if they ever got in trouble. They had no names, but only an address; a penthouse suite over the Waldorf Astoria. Only wealthy capitalists lived there. So he investigated and wrote his exposé after getting additional information from Quigley's book.
Epperson also wrote his exposé of the secret society he called "The Unseen Hand" obviously relating to George Washington's reference to the Lord's "invisible hand of providence" in founding this nation, only instead referring to those evil conspirators who also worked behind the scenes, but, instead, to destroy the Lord's handiwork.
___________
On a few occasions, you have alluded to the loss of liberties and destruction of our Constitutional government brought on by "a small group of people". The ones that you mention and name on the air represent only the ones (mostly political pawns) the PTB are willing to sacrifice to the view of the general public. There are many more behind the scenes and they will remain so until you begin shining your light of truth in their directions. They are the ones with the money and power (influence) to open the doors for the sacrificial pawns. If you don't think these pawns are expendable, watch what they do with Obama if, and when, he stops being influential among the minorities.
LtCol, USMC-Ret.
Michigan
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the light of publicity during those years But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination [read as 'republic'] practiced in past centuries." —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, at a Bilderberger Meeting in Baden Baden, Germany
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment