Re: [gingery_machines] Re: Electric furnace parts update

| | |

Monday, September 12, 2011

 

Be careful how you go to full power. I did that when I first made my modified Hartman furnace and promptly developed a hot spot on the element. In no time it had burned through. I think it would be best to put something in the furnace to prevent too sudden a temperature rise. I would also raise the temperature slowly in, say, 60 minutes.

On my furnace, the largest heat loss seems to be through gaps. I fixed the one between the top of the body and the lid by casting it in place. The bottom of the lid is now a match to the top of the body. I do have an access hole where I put through my thermocouple and look at the melt. It has got to be the leading heat loss location now. Yet it is not so bad that I would want to close it off. Most of my delay in reaching full heat is with the first melt of the day. I have to bring the "hot face" up to temperature. After that the cycle time is cut in half.

I have only melted aluminum in mine and the max power setting is 80%.

Rick
Rick.Sparber.org

On Sep 12, 2011, at 1:48 AM, lists <Stuartlists@orpheusinternet.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <j4js0t+p6p8@eGroups.com>,
> confed2001 <confed2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> It works & I have been using it for several years, but despite what the
>> plans say it does not get hot enough to melt copper much less brass. I
>> constructed the controller as described in the plans, and am using the
>> heating elements stated, but aluminum is the best I can get out of it.
>> If this controller will raise the temp of a small electric foundry than
>> I need to get one.
>
> I've not seen these particular plans but there are only two things that
> govern the achievable temperature of a furnace. 1) energy input 2) energy
> loss. The first is controlled by the resistance of the elements and the
> available voltage, the second by how well you insulate your furnace. For
> maximum energy input your controller must place no restriction on the
> current supplied.
>
> A simple way of testing the maximum achievable temperature is to bypass
> your controller and feed full supply voltage to your elements. This will
> tell you whether you need to look at improving 1, and 2 and whether there
> is a possible fault with your controller
>
> If you can get to the temperature you want with the controller bypassed,
> you have a faulty controller, if not you need to look at points 1 and 2
>
> --
> Stuart Winsor
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
<*> Member map - Who and where we are.  Please add yourself so members can find each other.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gingery_machines/app/peoplemap/view/map
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


A bad score is 598. A bad idea is not checking yours, at freecreditscore.com.
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Mister Colibri Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario