Susan isn't corrupt!!! She just disagrees with your statements and politics. I agree with her - if you aren't loyal to THIS NATION and to no other, go away.
--- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, Ron Gates <ronnmorrison@...> wrote:
>
> Sounds like you are one of the corrupt people I'm talking about    or are you
> one of those "my country right or wrong " folk?
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Susan <sailorgirl43@...>
> To: Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 December, 2010 23:46:50
> Subject: Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Wikileaks Mirror Sites, Amazon
> Boycott
>
> Â
> Move if you don't want to live here and feel as you do. We don't need people
> like you.Â
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Ron Gates <ronnmorrison@...> wrote:
>
> Â
> >SECRETS!!!!! not any more, now the world knows just how devious and corrupt the
> >US is, Assange should be given the Nobel peace prize
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________
> From: Susan <sailorgirl43@...>
> >
> >To: Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Monday, 6 December, 2010 1:32:25
> >Subject: Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Wikileaks Mirror Sites, Amazon
> >Boycott
> >
> >
> >Â
> >Are you insane???!!!!!?? Some of the secrets released may cause death and make
> >us vulnerable to our enemies. You must not love your freedom or country.Â
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Gary <garyrumor2@...> wrote:
> >
> >Â
> >>Wikileaks Mirror Sites, Amazon Boycott
> >>December 4th, 2010 I found this list of mirror sites on the CLG website. Since
> >>the government is pressuring groups to shut down Wikileaks, it is time for a
> >>thousand flowers of leakage to bloom. We need to water this world with the
> >>truth, so that those who make excuses for covering up the facts simply have no
> >>place to hide.
> >>
> >>
> >>Daniel Ellsberg is calling for a boycott of Amazon for caving into pressure from
> >>the administration in particular from Joe Biden, when they shut down the
> >>Wikileaks site. There is enough censorship in the mainstream media, we don¡¯t
> >>need to see the alternative media silenced.
> >>
> >>
> >>WikiLeaks Mirror Sites
> >>
> >>Find all the current Wikileaks Mirrors here. Helpful, if the main site -
> >>wikileaks.org - is down.
> >>
> >>Home About
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.org - Official Wikileaks Page [46.51.171.90, 184.72.37.90]
> >>
> >>¡öcablegate.wikileaks.org - Secret US Embassy Cables [91.194.60.90,
> >>91.194.60.112, 204.236.131.131]
> >>
> >>
> >>¡öchat.wikileaks.org - Secure SSL Chat Page [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡ösunshinepress.org - Secure Document Submission Page [88.80.2.32]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.com - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.net - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.biz - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.de - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.eu - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.fi - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.mobi - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.nl - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.pl - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.us - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>¡öljsf.org - Points to Official Site [88.80.13.160]
> >>
> >>Real mirrors on different IP Addresses
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.info - Mirror hosted in Switzerland [62.2.16.94]
> >>
> >>¡öwikileaks.se - Mirror hosted in Sweden [88.80.6.179]
> >>
> >>¡önyud.net - Mirror hosted in the United States [129.170.214.192]
> >>
> >>http://www.legitgov.org/WikiLeaks-Mirror-Sites
> >>
> >>This is from Forbes
> >>
> >>¡°Daniel Ellsberg Calls For Leaks From Amazon Insiders On WikiLeaks Snub
> >>Dec. 3 2010 - 10:19 am By ANDY GREENBERG
> >>
> >>There are two very different versions of the story leading up to Amazon¡¯s
> >>decision to boot WikiLeaks from its hosting services Wednesday. And Daniel
> >>Ellsberg, the leaker of 1971¡¯s iconic Pentagon Papers, knows something about
> >>how to find the right one.
> >>
> >>In an open letter to Amazon on his website, the former military analyst and
> >>antiwar activist called for Amazon employees to come forward with information
> >>detailing Amazon¡¯s decision to cut off WikiLeaks as a customer in the midst of
> >>the site¡¯s controversial publication of a quarter million secret diplomatic
> >>cables.
> >>
> >>This would be a good time for Amazon insiders who know and perhaps can document
> >>the political pressures that were brought to bear¡ªand the details of the hasty
> >>kowtowing by their bosses¡ªto leak that information. They can send it to
> >>Wikileaks (now on servers outside the US), to mainstream journalists or
> >>bloggers, or perhaps to a site like antiwar.com, which has now appropriately
> >>ended its book-purchasing association with Amazon and called a boycott.
> >>
> >>I should add that agreenberg (at) forbes.com wouldn¡¯t be a bad place to send
> >>those leaks either.
> >>
> >>On Thursday night, Amazon defended its decision to cut off WikiLeaks in a blog
> >>post, countering claims that it had caved to Senator Lieberman¡¯s political
> >>pressure. ¡°There have been reports that a government inquiry prompted us not to
> >>serve WikiLeaks any longer,¡± reads the statement. ¡°That is inaccurate.¡±
> >>Amazon¡¯s post goes on to argue that WikiLeaks defied its terms of service by
> >>hosting material it didn¡¯t own, and that the material poses a danger to people
> >>around the world¨Cit argues that ¡°it is not credible that the extraordinary
> >>volume of 250,000 classified documents that WikiLeaks is publishing could have
> >>been carefully redacted in such a way as to ensure that they weren¡¯t putting
> >>innocent people in jeopardy.¡±
> >>
> >>We¡¯ve been running AWS for over four years and have hundreds of thousands of
> >>customers storing all kinds of data on AWS. Some of this data is controversial,
> >>and that¡¯s perfectly fine. But, when companies or people go about securing and
> >>storing large quantities of data that isn¡¯t rightfully theirs, and publishing
> >>this data without ensuring it won¡¯t injure others, it¡¯s a violation of our
> >>terms of service, and folks need to go operate elsewhere.
> >>
> >>Amazon¡¯s statement conflicts with a report from Talking Points Memo that
> >>Lieberman¡¯s staff called Amazon to ask that WikiLeaks be removed from its
> >>servers, and that the company dutifully called back the next day to say that the
> >>whistleblower site had been booted, long before it made a public statement on
> >>the issue. Lieberman has gone on to argue that any other companies hosting
> >>WIkiLeaks data should be pressured to end their relationship.
> >>
> >>Whether Amazon is as politically craven as reports of Lieberman¡¯s influence
> >>would imply or simply abiding by its terms of service is a serious issue for the
> >>future of free speech¨Cand for the business of cloud-hosted services like
> >>Amazon¡¯s. Someone on the inside knows which version of events is true. And
> >>perhaps the truth will out.¡±
> >>
> >>http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/12/03/daniel-ellsberg-calls-for-leaks-from-amazon-on-wikileaks-snub/?boxes=Homepagelighttop
> >>
> >>
> >>From Daniel Ellsberg¡¯s site
> >>
> >>¡°For the last several years, I¡¯ve been spending over $100 a month on new and
> >>used books from Amazon. That¡¯s over. I ask Amazon to terminate immediately my
> >>membership in Amazon Prime and my Amazon credit card and account, to delete my
> >>contact and credit information from their files and to send me no more
> >>notices.¡±
> >>
> >>
> >>This is the link to Daniel Ellsberg
> >>http://www.ellsberg.net/
> >>
> >>I will add my name to the list. Garyrumor2@... Any info about government
> >>efforts to censor the internet would be of interest.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment