mmm, some folks in texas would disagree with you on this, I think it is
dallas 30 days of triple digits temp,,
** An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind Gandhi **
----- Original Message -----
From: "zeus32117" <zeus32117@yahoo.com>
To: <Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 7:02 PM
Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] Re: and NASA is the only agency
budget Obama cut
I have read in Encyclopedia Americana that the current climate is colder
than it was four thousand years ago when Southern China was covered by
tropical forests. Besides, the current interglacial epoch may end at any
time. Glaciers may start returning in less than one hundred years. They had
returned approximately one hundred thousand years ago after the precious
interglacial epoch had ended.
--- In Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com, Ron Gates
<ronnmorrison@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry Bruce but I think you will find there is a data problem with this
> satellite
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@...>
> To: individual-sovereignty <Individual-Sovereignty@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, 29 July, 2011 22:53:17
> Subject: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] and NASA is the only agency budget
> Obama
> cut
>
> Â
>
>
> New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming AlarmismBy James
> Taylor | Forbes â?" Wed, Jul 27, 2011
> *
> * tweet2568
> * Share
> * Email
> * Print
> RELATED CONTENT
> *
> New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
> NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's
> atmosphere
> is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmistÂ
> computer
> models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science
> journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global
> warming will
> occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports
> prior
> studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxidetrap far less
> heat
> than alarmists have claimed.
> Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the
> University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the
> Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite,
> reports
> that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple
> assumptions
> fed into alarmist computer models.
> "The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to
> space
> during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a
> July
> 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy
> between the
> data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."
> In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist
> computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the
> atmosphere
> begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models
> predicted.
> The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the
> global warming debate.
> Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general
> agreement
> about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of carbon
> dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However, the single most important
> issue in
> the global warming debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will
> indirectly
> trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric humidity and
> cirrus
> clouds. Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions
> indirectly cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus
> clouds
> (each of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data
> have
> long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much
> atmospheric
> humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have
> predicted..
> The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term NOAA and
> NASA
> data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not increasing
> in the
> manner predicted by alarmist computer models. The Terra satellite data
> also
> support data collected by NASA's ERBS satellite showing far more longwave
> radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and 1999 than
> alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA ERBS and Terra
> satellite data show that for 25 years and counting, carbon dioxide
> emissions
> have directly and indirectly trapped far less heat than alarmist computer
> models
> have predicted.
> In short, the central premise of alarmist global warming theory is that
> carbon
> dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain
> amount of
> heat in the earth's atmosphere and preventing it from escaping into
> space..
> Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being trapped in
> the
> earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more
> heat
> is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models predict.
> When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific
> journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and
> real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials
> would
> be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great
> deal
> about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.
> James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland
> Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News.Also Read
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3801 - Release Date: 07/31/11
No comments:
Post a Comment