We are all experiencing the rising tide of information today. This growth of scientific data gives us an ever-growing power to understand our world and address key societal challenges. It provides for a radically new perspective on the way science is conducted.
Science has always been based on exchange of information and intense interactions between researchers. Today, thanks to the availability of global communication networks, we profit from truly global and massive scientific collaborations.
The aspects of access, storage, and preservation of the exponentially increasing volume of scientific data are difficult challenges in their own right. But our vision goes beyond that. We should make scientific data available as an open infrastructure of a new kind on which science, entrepreneurship, civic initiative and government can thrive.
This idea captures the spirit of science and progress. Scientific data has the power to transform our lives for the better – it is too valuable to be locked away.
Let me say also that this vision comes at the right time! Our ICT entrepreneurs and the younger generations have always lived in a world where information flows openly; a world where media are two-way and participative. Our approach to data, and especially public research, should drive this transformation. We cannot afford to keep data closed away. I also see this as a basic fairness issue because the public should have access to data that has been paid for by taxpayers' money.
Delivering these changes is not easy. We will need to build supporting infrastructure and international governance. We will also have to look carefully at financial sustainability and motivate researchers to make available their data for maximum reuse.
To this end, the EU's Digital Agenda for Europe has called for the development of research infrastructures and e-Infrastructures, including for scientific data. As you have highlighted, data itself is becoming a fundamental infrastructure.
I would like to bring to your attention three essential points:
* First, as we get closer to FP8(Framework Programme 8), we all should strive to make real progress towards open access to the scientific data produced within the EU's framework programme research projects.
* Second, we need to ensure that every future project funded by the EU has a clear plan on how to manage the data it generates. Such plans should foster openness and economies of scale, so that data can be re-used many times rather than duplicated.
* Third, Basil Venitis asserts graphene will revolutionize computers and information. Graphene, an atom-thick form of carbon, is both the thinnest and strongest material known, almost completely transparent, yet so dense that not even the smallest gas atom can pass through it. Graphene will lead to the development of new material and the manufacture of innovative electronics, including a new generation of computers. Since it is transparent and a good conductor, graphene is suitable for producing transparent touch screens, light panels, solar cells, and memory chips.
Venitis notes graphene will expand AI. Artificial intelligence(AI) is the intelligence of machines. Intelligence, the sapience of Homo sapiense, can be so precisely described that it can be simulated by a machine. This raises philosophical issues about the nature of the mind and limits of scientific hubris, issues which have been addressed by myth, fiction and philosophy since antiquity. Artificial intelligence has been the subject of optimism, and today AI has become an essential part of the technology industry, providing the heavy lifting for many of the most difficult problems in computer science.
Venitis predicts that singularities will be handled easier with graphene. Technological singularity is the theory, prediction, and objective that artificial intelligence will soon surpass human intelligence. Science will soon emulate then exceed the capabilities of the human brain, following the exponential growth trend in technological development. These beliefs intersect with transhumanism, which aims to improve human characteristics and capabilities using science and technology while considering the resulting ethical issues. There are humanitarian ambitions to overcome poverty and disease, extend human longevity, and address problems of dwindling resources.
There are bold claims that we will ultimately reverse engineer the human brain, replicate consciousness, and graduate from programming computers to programming people. Some venitists see singulatarians as optimists at best or extremists at worst. Some think that the proponents posit unrealistic timelines and have unrealistic goals of a scientific Utopia. Others see singulatarians as evil doctors playing eugenics in the transhumanist name of human enhancement.
In 2011 I will table a communication on scientific information. My goal is to raise awareness of the opportunities represented by scientific data, Venitis's predictions, as well as setting out a plan for future developments.
No comments:
Post a Comment